Monitoring an Employee's Personal Email

There is much news relating to the right to respect an employees private life. And correspondence breached if, and when an employer is thinking of monitoring an employee’s personal email. A recent high profile case confirmed that monitoring an employee’s personal email is not something employers can do without just cause.
In Barulescu v Romania, Mr Barbulescu’s employer had asked him to set up a Yahoo email account that he would use for work. The employer accessed the e-mail account in the belief that it contained non work-related messages. The employer’s position was that since the email account had been set up at the Company’s request, its access to the account was legitimate.
The European Courts of Human Rights (ECHR) concluded that there had been no violation of Mr Barulescu’s right to a private life. Because, in this case, monitoring an employee’s personal email had been limited and proportionate. Also, it was not unreasonable for an employer to want to verify that employees’ were in fact working during business hours.
However, the decision does not give employers the right to snoop on employees’ personal emails. It does not overrule previous case law on the reasonable expectation of privacy. Consideration is also needed with regards to any interference in privacy to be proportionate. However, existing UK legislation also places important limitations on employers’ power to monitor their employees’ private communications.
Despite what has been widely reported in the press. This case does not set a precedent for employers thinking of monitoring an employee’s personal email without cause. The decision must be viewed in the context of both existing ECHR case law on privacy at work and existing UK legislation. This includes the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. It already places important limitations on employers’ power to monitor their employees’ private communications. Part 3 of the Information Commissioner’s “Employment Practices Code”, issued under the Data Protection Act. It contains important guidance for employers on how to comply with data protection principles in the context of email and internet monitoring of employees’ personal email. It also states monitoring must be carried out subject to reasonableness.
Businesses must have a well-drafted IT and communications policy in place. Because they must deal with the reviewing and monitoring of employees’ personal use of company IT systems. It also covers the use of e-mail in the workplace. The policy must be communicated to employees’ and enforced consistently. Therefore, ensuring your business has a clear policy in place means any action taken as a business depends on whether it strikes a fair balance between the employee’s right to privacy and the employer’s right to protect its business.

What do do Next

If you need help developing an appropriate IT / Communications Policy for your business, please contact Metis HR now on 01706 565332 for a no obligation initial consultation.

Question to ask?

If you want to learn more about the content covered in this post, please get in touch.

Latest posts

CASE STUDY: Managing Workplace Challenges

Overview In this case study, we delve into the intricate details of how Metis HR provided invaluable assistance to a kitchen company facing a complex people

Outsourcing your HR

What are the advantages? Read our blog to discover the benefits that come with outsourcing your HR responsibilities to the experts. If you’re interested in

Resolving Workplace Harassment

Metis HR – Case Study This case study highlights how Metis HR effectively assisted an Engineering Company in addressing and successfully resolving workplace harassment. If

Metis People

Sign up to receive email updates



    By using this form you agree with our privacy policy